| Essential Background | | Images and Media |
| Backgrounder: Saving the Skin of Property Owners In Connecticut: New London Residents Fight Eminent Domain Abuse | | Photos: Hundreds Rally To Support New London Homeowners |
| | Media: Download Photos of the June 23, 2005 Press conference at the U.S. Supreme Court |
| Latest Release: Susette Kelo Lost Her Rights, She Lost Her Property, But She Has Saved Her Home (June 30, 2006) | | Media: Download Client photos at their homes |
| | Photos from the oral argument |
| Launch Release: Institute for Justice Files Lawsuit Challenging Eminent Domain Abuse in New London, Connecticut (December 20, 2000) | | Client Video |
| | Hands Off My Home Campaign materials |
| | | |
| From the Argument | | Legal Briefs and Decisions |
| Listen: audio from the U.S. Supreme Court argument of Kelo v. New London | | Download IJ's petition for rehearing of Kelo v. New London |
| Download: transcript of the U.S. Supreme Court argument of Kelo v. New London | | Download the U.S. Supreme Court opinion of Kelo v. New London |
| | | Download “Friends of the Court” File Briefs Urging U.S. Supreme Court To End Eminent Domain Abuse |
| | | Download IJ's U.S. Supreme Court Reply Brief on the Merits |
| | Download IJ's U.S. Supreme Court Brief on the Merits |
| | | Download IJ's cert petition for this case |
|
| |
|
| Case Timeline |
| | | |
| | | Superior Court of New London |
| | | March 13, 2002: Superior Court of New London dismisses 11 out of 15 eminent domain actions. Both sides appealed |
| | March 3, 2004: Connecticut Supreme Court ruled against property owners by 4-3 vote |
|
| | April 20, 2004: Connecticut Supreme Court declined to reconsider ruling; issued stay pending appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court |
|
| | July 19, 2004:IJ appeals case to U.S. Supreme Court |
| | | September 28, 2004: U.S. Supreme Court accepts Kelo case |
|
| | June 23, 2005: U.S. Supreme Court rules against homeowners |
| | | |
| Additional Releases | | Maps, Charts and Facts |
| Release: One Year After Kelo Home and Small Business Owners to U.S. Senate: Stop Funding Eminent Domain Abuse (June 22, 2006) | | Castle Coalition Legislation Center: Tracking Eminent Domain Reform Legislation since Kelo |
| Release: Choice Looms for New London City Council: Abide by Governor’s Call to Return Deeds to Family-Occupied Homes Or Move to Evict Homeowners (June 5, 2006) | | Reporters and Editors: Download op-eds for publication |
| | IJ's first-ever nationwide report on eminent domain abuse: Public Power, Private Gain |
| Release: Connecticut Gov. Rell Clarifies Her Statement: She Supports Returning Deeds to Family-Occupied Homes, With Deadline Passed, New London Homeowners Fight On (June 2, 2006) | | Fight eminent domain abuse, become a Castle Coalition member today. |
| Release: Eminent Domain Reform Stalled in the U.S. Senate; Nearly Six Months After U.S. House of Representatives Vote Threat of Eminent Domain Abuse Still Hangs Over Homes, Businesses, Farms and Churches (April 26, 2006) | | |
| Release: One Year After Kelo Argument National Property Rights Revolt Still Going Strong (February 21, 2006) | | |
| Release: IJ and Homeowners to Connecticut Legislators: Adopt Real Eminent Domain Reform (October 6, 2005) | | |
| Release: NLDC Backs Down, New London Property Owners Safe For Now But Push for Legislative Reform Continues (September 16, 2005) |
| |
| Release: NLDC Lies Continue: Associated Press Report Impeaches NLDC Claims That Moratorium Promise Now Only Applies To New Takings (September 13, 2005) | | |
| | Op-eds, News Articles and Links |
| | Article: A Long Road; Susette Kelo Lost Her Rights, But She Will Keep Her Home, Liberty & Law (August 2006) |
| | Article: Kelo v. City of New London Behind the Scenes at IJ, Liberty & Law (April 2005) |
| Release: New London Development Corporation Breaks Eminent Domain Moratorium Pledge (September 13, 2005) |
| Article: Uphill and Against the Odds (December 2004) |
| Release: Author of Kelo Says He Would “Oppose” Eminent Domain Abuse as a Legislator (August 25, 2005) |
| Article: The Patriots of Fort Trumbull (December 2004) |
| Release: U.S. Supreme Court Denies Homeowners’ Request to Rehear Kelo (August 22, 2005) |
| Op-ed: We Happy Few (December 2004) |
| Release: Homeowners Ask U.S. Supreme Court: Rehear Eminent Domain Case (July 18, 2005) | | Article: Eminent Domain Without Limits? IJ Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Decide (August 2004) |
| Release: Grassroots Groundswell Grows Against Eminent Domain Abuse (July 12, 2005) | | Article: A Threat To Property Owners (March 5, 2004)  |
| Release: IJ’s $3 Million National Campaign Tells Lawmakers: “Hands Off My Home” (June 29, 2005) | | Article: Seven Fort Trumbull Holdouts Are Down, But Not Out Just Yet (March 4, 2004)  |
| Release: Floodgates Open: Tax-Hungry Governments & Land-Hungry Developers Rejoice in Green Light from U.S. Supreme Court (June 29, 2005) | | Article: Castle Coalition Defends Property Rights Across the Nation (February 2003) |
| | Article: Public Use or Private Gain? (December 15, 2002)  |
| |
| Release: U.S. Supreme Court rules against homeowners (June 23, 2005) | | Article: A Home Worth Fighting For (December 2, 2002)  |
| Release: 25 “Friends of the Court” File Briefs Urging U.S. Supreme Court To End Eminent Domain Abuse (December 9, 2004) | | Article: Private Property Seizures (July 31, 2001)  |
| | Article: Property Seizures overstep boundaries of ‘public use’ (March 21, 2001)  |
| Release: Institute for Justice Files Opening Brief With U.S. Supreme Court In Vital Case to Stop Eminent Domain Abuse (December 6, 2004) | | Article: Real People Pay Dearly For NLDC Land Grab (February 11, 2001)  |
| | Article: Eminent Domain Abuse Puts Owners, Tenants Out in The Cold (January 29, 2001)  |
| Release: U.S. Supreme Court Accepts Review Of New London Eminent Domain Abuse Case (September 28, 2004) | | |
| | |
| Release: U.S. Supreme Court Now Considering Whether To End Eminent Domain Abuse (September 8, 2004) |
|
| | |
| Release: Nobel Prize Winner Supports Homeowners Challenging Eminent Domain Abuse In U.S. Supreme Court Case (August 31, 2004) | | |
| | |
| Release: U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Halt Eminent Domain Abuse (July 20, 2004) | | |
| Release: Institute for Justice and Fort Trumbull Homeowners Ask Connecticut Supreme Court to Reconsider Decision Permitting Eminent Domain Abuse (March 29, 2004) | | |
| | |
| Release: Connecticut Supreme Court Permits Eminent Domain Abuse; A Majority of the Court Rules Against Homeowners in New London (March 3, 2004) | | |
| | |
| Release: Amid Eminent Domain Controversy, Congressman Simmons Forced To Withdraw Amendment For Coast Guard Museum (June 12, 2003) | | |
|
| |
| Release: Corporate Welfare vs. Constitutional Rights: Connecticut Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Eminent Domain Abuse (December 2, 2002) | | |
| | |
| Release: Martin Luther King III Offers Letter of Support For New London Property Owners In Eminent Domain Fight (December 2, 2002) | | |
| |
| Release: New London Families Ask Connecticut Supreme Court To Save Their Homes and Land from City & NLDC (July 2, 2002) | | |
| Release: Institute for Justice Calls on Coast Guard To Take Eminent Domain Off the Table In New London (May 16, 2002) | | |
| Release: Fort Trumbull Homeowners File Appeal to Protect Their Homes (April 1, 2002) | | |
| Release: Majority of Fort Trumbull Homeowners Win, Others To Appeal Institute for Justice Wins Another Eminent Domain Case (March 13, 2002) | |
|
| Release: New London Homes Targeted By Eminent Domain Abuse Now Safe Through Trial (February 22, 2001) | | |
| Release: Demolition of Homes Avoided—For Now (February 6, 2001) | | |
| | | |