 |
|


Economic Liberty
“The Institute for Justice argues that regulations that restrict entry into a field violate constitutional guarantees of liberty and equal protection of the laws when they bear no rational relationship to a legitimate government objective. In recent years the institute’s litigators have opened the taxi markets of Denver, Cincinnati and Indianapolis and have emancipated the providers of jitney services in Houston, generally for the benefit of minorities and to the consternation of protected interests.”
George F. Will
Arbitrary licensing and permitting laws foreclose many occupations that are ideally suited to people of modest means. The Institute for Justice challenges these laws to secure constitutional protection for the right to earn a living and to demonstrate the importance of entrepreneurship to inner-city revitalization.
The precedent we set in our work and the victories we achieve will pave the way for thousands of hard-working men and women to enter the work force and provide for themselves and their families through honest enterprise. Check out more information on our economic liberty litigation.
Current Economic Liberty Cases
|
|
Texas Computer RepairRife v. Texas Private Security Board
|
|
Fighting Maryland’s Veterinary CartelClemens v. Maryland State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, et al
|
|
Texas Equine Dentistry (Second Challenge)Boone, et al. v. Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, et al.
|
|
Texas Equine DentistryMitz v. Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
|
|
Wisconsin Gas TaxBhandari v. Nilsestuen
|
|
Minnesota TaxisMinneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
|
|
Minnesota Horse Teeth FloatingJohnson v. Minnesota Board of Veterinary Medicine
|
|
Massachusetts Nautical Tours
|
|
Maryland Funeral HomesBrown v. Hovatter
|
|
Pennsylvania River RaftingSummer's Best Two Weeks v. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources of the Commomwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.
|
|
Arizona San Tan FlatDale Bell v. Pinal County Board of Supervisors
|
|
|
Completed Economic Liberty Cases
|
|
Washington State Waste HaulingVentenbergs v. The City of Seattle
|
|
New Mexico Interior DesignSherry Franzoy and Caryn Armijo v. Barbara Templeman
|
|
Arizona Weed ControlRissmiller v. Arizona Structural Pest Control Commission
|
|
Seattle Bed & BreakfastMcAfertys v. City of Seattle
|
|
Red Wing Minn. Trash HaulingPaul's Industrial Garage and Gibson Sanitation v. City of Red Wing
|
|
Minneapolis Sign HangingDahlen v. City of Minneapolis
|
|
Missouri CasketsState Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Gegner
|
|
Louisiana FloristryMeadows v. Odom
|
|
Oklahoma Casket-SellingPowers v. Harris
|
|
Tennessee Casket SellingCraigmiles v. Giles
|
|
Las Vegas LimosClutter v. State of Nevada
|
|
Denver TaxisJones v. Temmer
|
|
Minnesota HairbraidingAnderson v. Minnesota Board of Barber and Cosmetologist Examiners
|
|
Mississippi African HairbraidingArmstrong v. Lunsford
|
|
New York Interstate Wine ShippingSwedenburg v. Kelly
|
|
New York City Commuter VansRicketts v. City of New York
|
|
Arizona HairbraidingFarmer v. Arizona Board of Cosmetology
|
|
California HairbraidingCornwell v. California Board of Barbering and Cosmetology
|
|
Washington D.C. HairbraidingTaalib-Din Adbul Uqdah v. District of Columbia
|
|
Washington State HairbraidingDiaw v. Washington State Cosmetology, Barbering, Esthetics, and Manicuring Advisory Board
|
|
Ohio HairbraidingHosey v. Ohio State Board of Cosmetology
|
|
Arizona Interstate Wine SellingParker v. Morrison
|
|
Davis-Bacon ActBrazier Construction Co., Inc., v. Reich
|
|
Arizona Pest Control
|
|
 |